Abstract
The purpose of this research is to understand the process of attitudinal changes towards a brand in crisis and the brand’s communication around the crisis by utilising balance theory and brand personality. Four crisis case studies were selected and data was collected from brands’ Twitter platforms on either side of the crisis event horizon. Results demonstrate an opportunity to update the balance theory approach in a crisis by considering the type of crisis (product harm vs. moral harm) relative to brand personality (brand competence vs. brand character). Balance theory helps explain how consumer attitude changes occur through a crisis. Further, the mapping of brand communications in social media over four selected case studies show that brand personality identity can change as a result of a crisis and demonstrate how brand managers can actively frame their online communication to help the brand to recover more effectively from a crisis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1031-1054 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Journal of Marketing Management |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 11-12 |
Early online date | 26 May 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Jul 2020 |
Keywords
- Brand crisis
- balance theory
- brand management
- brand personality
- consumer sentiment
- social media
Profiles
-
Fiona Lettice
- Norwich Business School - Emeritus Professor
- Innovation, Technology and Operations Management - Member
- ClimateUEA - Steering Committee Member
- CreativeUEA - Steering Committee Member
Person: Honorary, Research Group Member, Research Centre Member