Abstract
Climate impact assessment needs to take account of two interrelated processes: socio-economic change and climate change. To date, future change in socio-economic systems has not been sufficiently integrated with an analysis of climate change impacts. Participative and synthetic scenario approaches offer a means for dealing with critical issues of indeterminacy, innovation, reflexivity and framing in analysing change in socio-economic systems, paving the way for a coherent way of handling of socio-economic futures in impact assessment. We argue that scenarios represent heuristic tools that encourage social learning in climate impact assessment. The advantages and disadvantages of a scenario-based approach are explored using examples from regional climate impact assessment in the UK.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-95 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver