TY - JOUR
T1 - Students’ and tutors’ experiences of remote ‘student–patient’ consultations
AU - Armstrong, Sarah
AU - Alberti, Hugh
AU - Bhattacharya, Abhishek
AU - Dhokia, Bhavit
AU - Hall, Lauren
AU - Lawes-Wickwar, Sadie
AU - Lovat, Eitan
AU - Pandya, Shraya
AU - Park, Sophie
AU - Pope, Lindsey
AU - Sajid, Madiha
AU - Wilson, Penny
AU - Younie, Louise
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the Association for the Study of Medical Education. The authors thank all participating GP tutors and medical students from all institutions for their contribution. This paper and the research behind it would not have been possible without them. The authors are grateful to Madiha Sajid, who provided advice and guidance from her perspective as a Public Contributor.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Remote consulting has become part of the medical student clinical experience in primary care, but little research exists regarding the impact on learning. Aim: To describe the experiences of General Practitioner (GP) educators and medical students in using student-led remote consultations as an educational tool. Method: A qualitative, explorative study conducted at four UK medical schools. GP educators and medical students were purposively sampled and interviewed. Results: Nine themes arose: practical application, autonomy, heuristics, safety, triage of undifferentiated patients, clinical reasoning, patient inclusion in student education, student–patient interaction, and student–doctor interaction. Discussion: Remote consulting has become part of the clinical placement experience. This has been found to expose students to a wider variety of clinical presentations. Verbal communication, history-taking, triage, and clinical reasoning skills were practised through remote consulting, but examination skills development was lacking. Students found building rapport more challenging, although this was mitigated by having more time with patients. Greater clinical risk was perceived in remote consulting, which had potential to negatively impact students’ psychological safety. Frequent debriefs could ameliorate this risk and positively impact student–doctor relationships. Student autonomy and independence increased due to greater participation and responsibility. Pre-selection of patients could be helpful but had potential to expose students to lower complexity patients. Practice points Remote consulting confers unique educational benefits. Remote consulting can help develop history-taking and communication skills, as well as clinical reasoning skills. The psychological safety of the student and the supervisory risk of the tutor can be impacted by remote consulting, but frequent debriefs between the student and tutor can help mitigate this risk. Learning how to conduct remote, and face-to-face consultations is important in medical education.
AB - Background: Remote consulting has become part of the medical student clinical experience in primary care, but little research exists regarding the impact on learning. Aim: To describe the experiences of General Practitioner (GP) educators and medical students in using student-led remote consultations as an educational tool. Method: A qualitative, explorative study conducted at four UK medical schools. GP educators and medical students were purposively sampled and interviewed. Results: Nine themes arose: practical application, autonomy, heuristics, safety, triage of undifferentiated patients, clinical reasoning, patient inclusion in student education, student–patient interaction, and student–doctor interaction. Discussion: Remote consulting has become part of the clinical placement experience. This has been found to expose students to a wider variety of clinical presentations. Verbal communication, history-taking, triage, and clinical reasoning skills were practised through remote consulting, but examination skills development was lacking. Students found building rapport more challenging, although this was mitigated by having more time with patients. Greater clinical risk was perceived in remote consulting, which had potential to negatively impact students’ psychological safety. Frequent debriefs could ameliorate this risk and positively impact student–doctor relationships. Student autonomy and independence increased due to greater participation and responsibility. Pre-selection of patients could be helpful but had potential to expose students to lower complexity patients. Practice points Remote consulting confers unique educational benefits. Remote consulting can help develop history-taking and communication skills, as well as clinical reasoning skills. The psychological safety of the student and the supervisory risk of the tutor can be impacted by remote consulting, but frequent debriefs between the student and tutor can help mitigate this risk. Learning how to conduct remote, and face-to-face consultations is important in medical education.
KW - medical education
KW - primary care
KW - Remote consulting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147719196&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2170777
DO - 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2170777
M3 - Article
C2 - 36745733
AN - SCOPUS:85147719196
VL - 45
SP - 1038
EP - 1046
JO - Medical Teacher
JF - Medical Teacher
SN - 0142-159X
IS - 9
ER -