Teaching argument writing to 7‐ to 14‐year‐olds: an international review of the evidence of successful practice

Richard Andrews, Carole Torgerson, Graham Low, Nick McGuinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)


A systematic review was undertaken in 2006 to answer the question ‘What is the evidence for successful practice in teaching and learning with regard to non‐fiction writing (specifically argumentational writing) for 7‐ to 14‐year‐olds?’, using EPPI‐Centre methodology. Results showed that certain conditions have to be in place. These include: a writing process model in which students are encouraged to plan, draft, edit and revise their writing; some degree of cognitive reasoning training in addition to natural cognitive development; peer collaboration, thus modelling a dialogue that will become internal and constitute ‘thought’; and explicit explanations of the learning processes. Specific strategies include: ‘heuristics’; planning; oral argument, counterargument and rebuttal to inform written argument; explicit goals (including audiences) for writing; teacher modelling of argumentational writing; and ‘procedural facilitation’. This article confirms the results of the 2006 study in the light of recent research. Implications for policy, practice and further research are considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-310
Number of pages10
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Issue number3
Early online date11 Aug 2009
Publication statusPublished - 2009


  • pedagogy
  • learning
  • literacy
  • national curriculum
  • argumentation

Cite this