TY - JOUR
T1 - The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale: Reliability and validity
AU - Collins, J.
AU - Langdon, P. E.
AU - Barnoux, M.
N1 - Funding Information: We would like to acknowledge the contributions of Edgar Casimiro, Samantha Reynolds, Imrana Choudhry, Dr Ian Thorne, Dr Nahema Rajabali, Tia Posner, Dr Natalie Southall, James Dennis and Maddison White who were involved in data collection for this study. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Background: The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale was developed for use with adults with developmental disabilities targeting fire-related factors thought to be associated with deliberate firesetting behaviour (i.e. attitudes towards fire, fire interest, fire normalisation, identification with fire and fire safety awareness). However, the psychometric properties of the scale are yet to be evaluated. Method: The reliability, validity, comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale were evaluated. Fifty-nine adults with developmental disabilities, some of whom had a history of firesetting, completed the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale on two occasions. Feedback about the questionnaire was sought from both participants and professionals. Results: The AFAS has acceptable internal consistency and excellent test–retest reliability. The attitudes towards fire, fire normalisation, poor fire safety subscales and total scores discriminated firesetters from non-firesetters. Content analysis of feedback indicated items of the AFAS were understood, relevant, accessible and comprehensible. Conclusion: A larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of the AFAS.
AB - Background: The Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale was developed for use with adults with developmental disabilities targeting fire-related factors thought to be associated with deliberate firesetting behaviour (i.e. attitudes towards fire, fire interest, fire normalisation, identification with fire and fire safety awareness). However, the psychometric properties of the scale are yet to be evaluated. Method: The reliability, validity, comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness of the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale were evaluated. Fifty-nine adults with developmental disabilities, some of whom had a history of firesetting, completed the Adapted Firesetting Assessment Scale on two occasions. Feedback about the questionnaire was sought from both participants and professionals. Results: The AFAS has acceptable internal consistency and excellent test–retest reliability. The attitudes towards fire, fire normalisation, poor fire safety subscales and total scores discriminated firesetters from non-firesetters. Content analysis of feedback indicated items of the AFAS were understood, relevant, accessible and comprehensible. Conclusion: A larger study is needed to examine the factor structure of the AFAS.
KW - AFAS
KW - Arson
KW - autism
KW - developmental disabilities
KW - firesetting
KW - intellectual disabilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130745945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jir.12950
DO - 10.1111/jir.12950
M3 - Article
C2 - 35621252
AN - SCOPUS:85130745945
VL - 66
SP - 642
EP - 654
JO - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
JF - Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
SN - 0964-2633
IS - 7
ER -