The Axford debate revisited: A case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data

Ian J. Bateman, Ian H. Langford, Naohito Nishikawa, Iain Lake

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

67 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	291-302
Number of pages	12
Journal	Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
Volume	43
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560010720
Publication status	Published - 2000

Access to Document

@article{27effa405d904a9ea81506047a3b0092,

title = "The Axford debate revisited: A case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data",

author = "Bateman, {Ian J.} and Langford, {Ian H.} and Naohito Nishikawa and Iain Lake",

year = "2000",

doi = "10.1080/09640560010720",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "291--302",

journal = "Journal of Environmental Planning and Management",

issn = "0964-0568",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Axford debate revisited: A case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data

AU - Bateman, Ian J.

AU - Langford, Ian H.

AU - Nishikawa, Naohito

AU - Lake, Iain

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

U2 - 10.1080/09640560010720

DO - 10.1080/09640560010720

M3 - Article

SN - 0964-0568

VL - 43

SP - 291

EP - 302

JO - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

IS - 2

ER -