The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Toby O. Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T. Donell; Caroline B. Hing

doi:10.3109/17453674.2010.533933

The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Toby O. Smith, Rachel Nichols, Simon T. Donell, Caroline B. Hing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On the basis of the current evidence base, HRS may have better functional outcomes than THA, but the increased risks of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery following HRS indicate that THA is superior in terms of implant survival.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	684-695
Number of pages	12
Journal	Acta Orthopaedica
Volume	81
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.533933
Publication status	Published - Dec 2010

Access to Document

10.3109/17453674.2010.533933Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{86a19288bb20442892290178b55d3786,

title = "The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review",

abstract = "On the basis of the current evidence base, HRS may have better functional outcomes than THA, but the increased risks of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery following HRS indicate that THA is superior in terms of implant survival.",

author = "Smith, {Toby O.} and Rachel Nichols and Donell, {Simon T.} and Hing, {Caroline B.}",

year = "2010",

month = dec,

doi = "10.3109/17453674.2010.533933",

language = "English",

volume = "81",

pages = "684--695",

journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",

issn = "1745-3682",

publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis and systematic review

AU - Smith, Toby O.

AU - Nichols, Rachel

AU - Donell, Simon T.

AU - Hing, Caroline B.

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - On the basis of the current evidence base, HRS may have better functional outcomes than THA, but the increased risks of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery following HRS indicate that THA is superior in terms of implant survival.

AB - On the basis of the current evidence base, HRS may have better functional outcomes than THA, but the increased risks of heterotopic ossification, aseptic loosening, and revision surgery following HRS indicate that THA is superior in terms of implant survival.

U2 - 10.3109/17453674.2010.533933

DO - 10.3109/17453674.2010.533933

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 684

EP - 695

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3682

IS - 6

ER -