Abstract
Although the risk of thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty continues beyond hospital discharge, the cost-effectiveness of extending prophylaxis beyond hospitalization is unclear. We compared the cost-effectiveness of an extended duration of antithrombotic prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty, with use of low-molecular-weight heparin or warfarin administered for twenty-eight days beyond hospital discharge, in terms of incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 819-828 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Anticoagulants
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight
- Humans
- Thromboembolism
- Time Factors
- Warfarin
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver