Abstract
At the beginning of the 1970s, the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) changed its longstanding policy on refusing to certify films that portrayed real crimes and court cases that happened within the past fifty years. This shift in policy was for 10 Rilllington Place (Richard Fleischer, 1971), a British film about London serial killer John Christie and the miscarriage of justice that led to the execution of the wrong man. This move to considering each film individually was the culmination of ten years of contention between the BBFC, a variety of filmmakers wishing to make a Christie film, the television industries, and the State. This chapter argues that the protracted production histories of the unmade Christie films and 10 Rilllington Place should be understood in the context of wider political and societal debates relating to the death penalty and its abolition, and the shock of the Moors murders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Adult Themes |
| Subtitle of host publication | British Cinema and the ‘X’ Rating, 1958-1972 |
| Editors | Anne Etienne, Benjamin Halligan, Christopher Weedman |
| Publisher | Bloomsbury Academic |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781501375262, 9781501375286 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781501375279 |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Sept 2023 |
Publication series
| Name | Global Exploitation Cinemas |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver