Abstract
Important gaps remain in the understanding of the economic consequences of civil war. Focusing on the conflict in Rwanda in the early 1990s, and using micro data, this article finds that households and localities that experienced more intense conflict are lagging behind in terms of consumption six years after the conflict, a finding that is robust to taking into account the endogeneity of violence. Significantly different returns to land and labor are observed between zones that experienced low- and high-intensity conflict which is consistent with the ongoing recovery. Distinguishing between civil war and genocide, the findings also provide evidence that these returns, and by implication the process of recovery, depend on the form of violence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-592 |
| Number of pages | 38 |
| Journal | Journal of Conflict Resolution |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 30 Dec 2013 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- civil war
- economic growth
- Rwanda
- human capital
Profiles
-
Pieter Serneels
- School of Global Development - Professor of Economics
- Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research - Member
- Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science - Member
- Impact Evaluation - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching and Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver