The Regulation of Commercial Profiling – A Comparative Analysis

Indra Spiecker genannt Döhmann; Olivia Tambou; Paul Bernal; Margaret Hu; Carlos Alberto Molinaro; Elsa Negre; Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet; Laura Schertel Mendes; Normann Witzleb; Florian Yger

The Regulation of Commercial Profiling – A Comparative Analysis

Indra Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Olivia Tambou, Paul Bernal, Margaret Hu, Carlos Alberto Molinaro, Elsa Negre, Ingo Wolfgang Sarlet, Laura Schertel Mendes, Normann Witzleb, Florian Yger

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

48 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The authors, all data protection experts, discuss the status of the relevant data protection regulatory framework on profiling in the business sector in sev- eral countries worldwide, from the constitutional lev- el to some individual regulation including the gener- al attitude towards the topic. The EU perspective is presented on the basis of the present directives as well as the General Data Protection Regulation. The United Kingdom, Germany and France, as three of the largest EU Member States with partly highly dif- fering regulatory approaches represent Member State law. Australia, Brazil and the US regulation ex- emplify the different integration of data protection standards and different models of approaching pro- filing in the globalised IT world.**

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	535-554
Number of pages	20
Journal	European Data Protection Law Review
Volume	2
Issue number	4
Publication status	Published - 2016

Keywords

Data Protection
Profiling

Access to Document

Final reportFinal published version, 1.57 MB

http://10.21552/EDPL/2016/4/12

Cite this

@article{e8ec0187ed9b4987a3576138fa55e07a,

title = "The Regulation of Commercial Profiling – A Comparative Analysis",

abstract = "The authors, all data protection experts, discuss the status of the relevant data protection regulatory framework on profiling in the business sector in sev- eral countries worldwide, from the constitutional lev- el to some individual regulation including the gener- al attitude towards the topic. The EU perspective is presented on the basis of the present directives as well as the General Data Protection Regulation. The United Kingdom, Germany and France, as three of the largest EU Member States with partly highly dif- fering regulatory approaches represent Member State law. Australia, Brazil and the US regulation ex- emplify the different integration of data protection standards and different models of approaching pro- filing in the globalised IT world.**",

keywords = "Data Protection, Profiling",

author = "{Spiecker genannt D{\"o}hmann}, Indra and Olivia Tambou and Paul Bernal and Margaret Hu and Molinaro, {Carlos Alberto} and Elsa Negre and Sarlet, {Ingo Wolfgang} and Mendes, {Laura Schertel} and Normann Witzleb and Florian Yger",

year = "2016",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "535--554",

journal = "European Data Protection Law Review",

issn = "2364-2831",

publisher = "Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH",

number = "4",

}

The Regulation of Commercial Profiling – A Comparative Analysis. / Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Indra; Tambou, Olivia; Bernal, Paul; Hu, Margaret; Molinaro, Carlos Alberto; Negre, Elsa; Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang; Mendes, Laura Schertel; Witzleb, Normann; Yger, Florian.

In: European Data Protection Law Review, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2016, p. 535-554.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Regulation of Commercial Profiling – A Comparative Analysis

AU - Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Indra

AU - Tambou, Olivia

AU - Bernal, Paul

AU - Hu, Margaret

AU - Molinaro, Carlos Alberto

AU - Negre, Elsa

AU - Sarlet, Ingo Wolfgang

AU - Mendes, Laura Schertel

AU - Witzleb, Normann

AU - Yger, Florian

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The authors, all data protection experts, discuss the status of the relevant data protection regulatory framework on profiling in the business sector in sev- eral countries worldwide, from the constitutional lev- el to some individual regulation including the gener- al attitude towards the topic. The EU perspective is presented on the basis of the present directives as well as the General Data Protection Regulation. The United Kingdom, Germany and France, as three of the largest EU Member States with partly highly dif- fering regulatory approaches represent Member State law. Australia, Brazil and the US regulation ex- emplify the different integration of data protection standards and different models of approaching pro- filing in the globalised IT world.**

AB - The authors, all data protection experts, discuss the status of the relevant data protection regulatory framework on profiling in the business sector in sev- eral countries worldwide, from the constitutional lev- el to some individual regulation including the gener- al attitude towards the topic. The EU perspective is presented on the basis of the present directives as well as the General Data Protection Regulation. The United Kingdom, Germany and France, as three of the largest EU Member States with partly highly dif- fering regulatory approaches represent Member State law. Australia, Brazil and the US regulation ex- emplify the different integration of data protection standards and different models of approaching pro- filing in the globalised IT world.**

KW - Data Protection

KW - Profiling

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 535

EP - 554

JO - European Data Protection Law Review

JF - European Data Protection Law Review

SN - 2364-2831

IS - 4

ER -