TY - JOUR
T1 - The relative influences of primary and secondary particulates to urban air quality in the United Kingdom
AU - Chatterton, Tim
AU - Dorling, Stephen
AU - Lovett, Andrew
AU - Stephenson, Michael
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - This study uses a combination of data from U.K. monitoringstations and from modelling undertaken with the U.K.Meteorological Office''s NAME Model to investigate therelative influences of primary and secondary particulateson total PM10 levels at sites in the United Kingdom. Co-located PM10 and sulphate aerosol measurementsindicate that sulphate has a disproportionately largeinfluence on the variation of PM10 levels incomparison to its contribution to their total mass.Comparisons of measured PM10 at urban centre, roadsideand rural sites suggest that local primary sources havevery little influence on daily mean levels. NAME has beenused to model both primary particles and sulphate aerosolfrom sources across the whole of Europe. The discrepanciesbetween modelled and observed PM10 suggest that coarseparticles, such as windblown dust and resuspended roaddust,may comprise a very large, if not dominant, proportion ofobserved PM10 levels. The apparently minor role ofprimary particles (especially locally-sourced ones) raisesa number of issues regarding the suitability of current U.K.and European legislation to addressing the particle problem.
AB - This study uses a combination of data from U.K. monitoringstations and from modelling undertaken with the U.K.Meteorological Office''s NAME Model to investigate therelative influences of primary and secondary particulateson total PM10 levels at sites in the United Kingdom. Co-located PM10 and sulphate aerosol measurementsindicate that sulphate has a disproportionately largeinfluence on the variation of PM10 levels incomparison to its contribution to their total mass.Comparisons of measured PM10 at urban centre, roadsideand rural sites suggest that local primary sources havevery little influence on daily mean levels. NAME has beenused to model both primary particles and sulphate aerosolfrom sources across the whole of Europe. The discrepanciesbetween modelled and observed PM10 suggest that coarseparticles, such as windblown dust and resuspended roaddust,may comprise a very large, if not dominant, proportion ofobserved PM10 levels. The apparently minor role ofprimary particles (especially locally-sourced ones) raisesa number of issues regarding the suitability of current U.K.and European legislation to addressing the particle problem.
U2 - 10.1023/A:1021327132509
DO - 10.1023/A:1021327132509
M3 - Article
SN - 1573-2940
VL - 2
SP - 173
EP - 187
JO - Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus
JF - Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus
IS - 5/6
ER -