Abstract
Whilst environmental impact assessment (EIA) in England overall can be said to be of a good to satisfactory quality, we believe that the revised EIA Directive will be able to strengthen it further by addressing gaps with regards to the consideration of alternatives, climate change mitigation and adaptation, the consideration of accidents and disasters along with human health, land and
biodiversity. Some challenges, however, are likely to remain, for example, with regards to penalties for non-compliance and a scoping stage that will remain optional. The biggest unknown at the time of writing this article however is whether or not the UK will remain in the EU, giving rise to some considerable uncertainties.
biodiversity. Some challenges, however, are likely to remain, for example, with regards to penalties for non-compliance and a scoping stage that will remain optional. The biggest unknown at the time of writing this article however is whether or not the UK will remain in the EU, giving rise to some considerable uncertainties.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 106-112 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | UVP Report |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 10 Aug 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- England
- Environmental impact assessment
- EU law
- Environmental law