The risk of ill‐informed reform: The future for English flood risk management

Meghan Alexander; Sally Priest; Edmund Penning-Rowsell

doi:10.1111/area.12393

The risk of ill‐informed reform: The future for English flood risk management

Meghan Alexander (Lead Author), Sally Priest, Edmund Penning-Rowsell

School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flood risk in the UK is recognised by many as a major 21st century challenge. However Flood Risk Management (FRM) has become widely contested, with the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) Committee recently calling for major governance reform. Engaging this debate, this commentary evaluates the extent to which such reform is necessary or wise when it appears that it may ironically, albeit inadvertently, exacerbate key criticisms of the current system.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	426-429
Number of pages	4
Journal	Area
Volume	50
Issue number	3
Early online date	16 Oct 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12393
Publication status	Published - Sep 2018

Keywords

Coordination
Flood risk
England
Governance

Access to Document

10.1111/area.12393

http://orca.cf.ac.uk/105584/

Cite this

@article{df5dbfa75ab2438188bd907af36bc135,

title = "The risk of ill‐informed reform: The future for English flood risk management",

abstract = "Flood risk in the UK is recognised by many as a major 21st century challenge. However Flood Risk Management (FRM) has become widely contested, with the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) Committee recently calling for major governance reform. Engaging this debate, this commentary evaluates the extent to which such reform is necessary or wise when it appears that it may ironically, albeit inadvertently, exacerbate key criticisms of the current system.",

keywords = "Coordination, Flood risk, England, Governance",

author = "Meghan Alexander and Sally Priest and Edmund Penning-Rowsell",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1111/area.12393",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "426--429",

journal = "Area",

issn = "0004-0894",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The risk of ill‐informed reform: The future for English flood risk management

AU - Alexander, Meghan

AU - Priest, Sally

AU - Penning-Rowsell, Edmund

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Flood risk in the UK is recognised by many as a major 21st century challenge. However Flood Risk Management (FRM) has become widely contested, with the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) Committee recently calling for major governance reform. Engaging this debate, this commentary evaluates the extent to which such reform is necessary or wise when it appears that it may ironically, albeit inadvertently, exacerbate key criticisms of the current system.

AB - Flood risk in the UK is recognised by many as a major 21st century challenge. However Flood Risk Management (FRM) has become widely contested, with the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) Committee recently calling for major governance reform. Engaging this debate, this commentary evaluates the extent to which such reform is necessary or wise when it appears that it may ironically, albeit inadvertently, exacerbate key criticisms of the current system.

KW - Coordination

KW - Flood risk

KW - England

KW - Governance

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/area.12393

U2 - 10.1111/area.12393

DO - 10.1111/area.12393

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 426

EP - 429

JO - Area

JF - Area

SN - 0004-0894

IS - 3

ER -

The risk of ill‐informed reform: The future for English flood risk management

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this