Abstract
Using a discrete choice experiment, we elicit valuations of engagement with ‘everyday wildlife’ through feeding garden birds. We find that bird-feeding is primarily but not exclusively motivated by the direct consumption value of interaction with wildlife. The implicit valuations given to different species suggest that people prefer birds that have aesthetic appeal and that evoke human feelings of protectiveness. These findings suggest that people derive wellbeing by adopting a warden-like role towards ‘their’ wildlife. We test for external validity by conducting a hedonic analysis of sales of bird food. We discuss some policy implications of the existence of warden attitudes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 127-155 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Environmental and Resource Economics |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 20 Oct 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2017 |
Keywords
- use value
- everyday wildlife
- discrete choice experiment
- nature connectivity
- warden attitude
- garden birds
- hedonic
Profiles
-
Robert Sugden
- School of Economics - Professor of Economics
- Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science - Member
- Centre for Competition Policy - Member
- Behavioural Economics - Member
- Economic Theory - Member
Person: Research Group Member, Research Centre Member, Academic, Teaching & Research