Abstract
Usability has become an imperative aspect of survival on the web, thus, it has always been considered as a crucial aspect of web design. This paper presents the results of a study that compared two think-aloud usability testing methods: the concurrent think-aloud and the retrospective think-aloud methods. Data from task performance, testing experience, and usability problems were collected from 40 participants equally distributed between the two think-aloud conditions. The results found that while the thinking aloud method had no impact on task performance and participants testing experience, participants using the concurrent think-aloud method detected a larger number of minor problems with the test interface than participants using the retrospective think-aloud method. These findings suggest a reason for preferring the concurrent think-aloud method to the retrospective one.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2016 - Poole, United Kingdom Duration: 11 Jul 2016 → 15 Jul 2016 |
Conference
Conference | 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference, HCI 2016 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Poole |
Period | 11/07/16 → 15/07/16 |
Keywords
- Think-aloud protocols
- Usability testing
- User studies