Three institutional pathways to envision the future of the IPCC

Shinichiro Asayama, Kari De Pryck, Silke Beck, Béatrice Cointe, Paul N. Edwards, Hélène Guillemot, Karin M. Gustafsson, Friederike Hartz, Hannah Hughes, Bård Lahn, Olivier Leclerc, Rolf Lidskog, Jasmine E. Livingston, Irene Lorenzoni, Joanna Petrasek Macdonald, Martin Mahony, Jean Carlos Hochsprung Miguel, Marko Monteiro, Jessica O'Reilly, Warren PearceArthur Petersen, Bernd Siebenhüner, Tora Skodvin, Adam Standring, Göran Sundqvist, Renzo Taddei, Bianca van Bavel, Mark Vardy, Yulia Yamineva, Mike Hulme

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The IPCC has been successful at building its scientific authority, but it will require institutional reform for staying relevant to new and changing political contexts. Exploring a range of alternative future pathways for the IPCC can help guide crucial decisions about redefining its purpose.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-880
Number of pages4
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume13
Issue number9
Early online date4 Sep 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2023

Cite this