Through a glass, darkly: Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies court

Polly Morgan

doi:10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706

Through a glass, darkly: Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies court

Polly Morgan

School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There has been much recent debate about whether parties in family cases should be identified in published judgments and media reports. In an important contribution to the debate, Mostyn J surveys the legal position in his judgment in Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52 and sets out the approach that should be taken to the reporting of financial remedies proceedings.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	541-543
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Volume	44
Issue number	4
Early online date	26 Oct 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706
Publication status	Published - Feb 2023

Keywords

Matrimonial Causes Act 1973
anonymity
financial remedies
reporting restriction order
transparency

Access to Document

10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Through a glass darkly Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies courtFinal published version, 620 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{c9f93f6eb5aa423394645269b3b2e382,

title = "Through a glass, darkly: Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies court",

abstract = "There has been much recent debate about whether parties in family cases should be identified in published judgments and media reports. In an important contribution to the debate, Mostyn J surveys the legal position in his judgment in Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52 and sets out the approach that should be taken to the reporting of financial remedies proceedings.",

keywords = "Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, anonymity, financial remedies, reporting restriction order, transparency",

author = "Polly Morgan",

year = "2023",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "541--543",

journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",

issn = "0964-9069",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Through a glass, darkly: Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies court

AU - Morgan, Polly

PY - 2023/2

Y1 - 2023/2

N2 - There has been much recent debate about whether parties in family cases should be identified in published judgments and media reports. In an important contribution to the debate, Mostyn J surveys the legal position in his judgment in Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52 and sets out the approach that should be taken to the reporting of financial remedies proceedings.

AB - There has been much recent debate about whether parties in family cases should be identified in published judgments and media reports. In an important contribution to the debate, Mostyn J surveys the legal position in his judgment in Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52 and sets out the approach that should be taken to the reporting of financial remedies proceedings.

KW - Matrimonial Causes Act 1973

KW - anonymity

KW - financial remedies

KW - reporting restriction order

KW - transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140842094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706

DO - 10.1080/09649069.2022.2136706

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 541

EP - 543

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 4

ER -

Through a glass, darkly: Gallagher and transparency in the financial remedies court

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this