TY - JOUR
T1 - Time resolved photoelectron spectroscopy as a test of electronic structure and nonadiabatic dynamics
AU - Chakraborty, Pratip
AU - Liu, Yusong
AU - McClung, Samuel
AU - Weinacht, Thomas
AU - Matsika, Spiridoula
N1 - Funding information: The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Energy (DOE, Award No. DE-FG02-08ER15983 for Pratip Chakraborty and Spiridoula Matsika and DOE, Award No. DE-FG02-08ER15984 for Yusong Liu, Samuel McClung and Thomas Weinacht) for funding. Part of the computational work was performed using the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE), which is supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. ACI-1548562.
PY - 2021/6/3
Y1 - 2021/6/3
N2 - We compare different levels of theory for simulating excited state molecular dynamics and use time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy measurements to benchmark the theory. We perform trajectory surface hopping simulations for uracil excited to the first bright state (ππ*) using three different levels of theory (CASSCF, MRCIS, and XMS-CASPT2) in order to understand the role of dynamical correlation in determining the excited state dynamics, with a focus on the coupling between different electronic states and internal conversion back to the ground state. These dynamics calculations are used to simulate the time-resolved photoelectron spectra. The comparison of the calculated and measured spectra allows us to draw conclusions regarding the relative insights and quantitative accuracy of the calculations at the three different levels of theory, demonstrating that detailed quantitative comparisons of time-resolved photoelectron spectra can be used to benchmark methodology.
AB - We compare different levels of theory for simulating excited state molecular dynamics and use time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy measurements to benchmark the theory. We perform trajectory surface hopping simulations for uracil excited to the first bright state (ππ*) using three different levels of theory (CASSCF, MRCIS, and XMS-CASPT2) in order to understand the role of dynamical correlation in determining the excited state dynamics, with a focus on the coupling between different electronic states and internal conversion back to the ground state. These dynamics calculations are used to simulate the time-resolved photoelectron spectra. The comparison of the calculated and measured spectra allows us to draw conclusions regarding the relative insights and quantitative accuracy of the calculations at the three different levels of theory, demonstrating that detailed quantitative comparisons of time-resolved photoelectron spectra can be used to benchmark methodology.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107711089
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00926
DO - 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00926
M3 - Article
SN - 1948-7185
VL - 12
SP - 5099
EP - 5104
JO - The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
JF - The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
IS - 21
ER -