TY - JOUR
T1 - Total iron absorbed from iron-biofortified potatoes is higher than from non-biofortified potatoes: a randomized trial using stable iron isotopes in women from the Peruvian highlands
AU - Burgos, Gabriela
AU - Liria, Reyna
AU - Zeder, Christophe
AU - Kroon, Paul A.
AU - Hareau, Guy
AU - Penny, Mary
AU - Dainty, Jack
AU - Al-Jaibaji, Olla
AU - Boy, Erick
AU - Mithen, Richard
AU - Hurrell, Richard F.
AU - Salas, Elisa
AU - zum Felde, Thomas
AU - Zimmermann, Michael B.
AU - Fairweather-Tait, Susan
N1 - Funding Information: This research was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Grant No. BB/S014039/1. We gratefully acknowledge USAID Feed the Future Crops to End Hunger award to CIP (DIS-B-AID-BFS-IO-17-00005).
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Yellow-fleshed potatoes biofortified with iron have been developed through conventional breeding, but the bioavailability of iron is unknown. Objectives: Our objective was to measure iron absorption from an iron-biofortified yellow-fleshed potato clone in comparison with a nonbiofortified yellow-fleshed potato variety. Methods: We conducted a single-blinded, randomized, crossover, multiple-meal intervention study. Women (n = 28; mean ± SD plasma ferritin 21.3 ± 3.3 μg/L) consumed 10 meals (460 g) of both potatoes, each meal extrinsically labeled with either
58Fe sulfate (biofortified) or
57Fe sulfate (nonfortified), on consecutive days. Iron absorption was estimated from iron isotopic composition in erythrocytes 14 d after administration of the final meal. Results: Mean ± SD iron, phytic acid, and ascorbic acid concentrations in iron-biofortified and the nonfortified potato meals (mg/per 100 mg) were 0.63 ± 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.01, 39.34 ± 3.04 and 3.10 ± 1.72, and 7.65 ± 0.34 and 3.74 ± 0.39, respectively (P < 0.01), whereas chlorogenic acid concentrations were 15.14 ± 1.72 and 22.52 ± 3.98, respectively (P < 0.05). Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 12.1% (10.3%–14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0%–19.6%), respectively (P < 0.001). Total iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 0.35 mg (0.30–0.41 mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20–0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: TIA from iron-biofortified potato meals was 45.8% higher than that from nonbiofortified potato meals, suggesting that iron biofortification of potatoes through conventional breeding is a promising approach to improve iron intake in iron-deficient women. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as Identifier number NCT05154500.
AB - Background: Yellow-fleshed potatoes biofortified with iron have been developed through conventional breeding, but the bioavailability of iron is unknown. Objectives: Our objective was to measure iron absorption from an iron-biofortified yellow-fleshed potato clone in comparison with a nonbiofortified yellow-fleshed potato variety. Methods: We conducted a single-blinded, randomized, crossover, multiple-meal intervention study. Women (n = 28; mean ± SD plasma ferritin 21.3 ± 3.3 μg/L) consumed 10 meals (460 g) of both potatoes, each meal extrinsically labeled with either
58Fe sulfate (biofortified) or
57Fe sulfate (nonfortified), on consecutive days. Iron absorption was estimated from iron isotopic composition in erythrocytes 14 d after administration of the final meal. Results: Mean ± SD iron, phytic acid, and ascorbic acid concentrations in iron-biofortified and the nonfortified potato meals (mg/per 100 mg) were 0.63 ± 0.01 and 0.31 ± 0.01, 39.34 ± 3.04 and 3.10 ± 1.72, and 7.65 ± 0.34 and 3.74 ± 0.39, respectively (P < 0.01), whereas chlorogenic acid concentrations were 15.14 ± 1.72 and 22.52 ± 3.98, respectively (P < 0.05). Geometric mean (95% CI) fractional iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 12.1% (10.3%–14.2%) and 16.6% (14.0%–19.6%), respectively (P < 0.001). Total iron absorption from the iron-biofortified clone and the nonbiofortified variety were 0.35 mg (0.30–0.41 mg) and 0.24 mg (0.20–0.28 mg) per 460 g meal, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: TIA from iron-biofortified potato meals was 45.8% higher than that from nonbiofortified potato meals, suggesting that iron biofortification of potatoes through conventional breeding is a promising approach to improve iron intake in iron-deficient women. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as Identifier number NCT05154500.
KW - Latin America
KW - bioavailability
KW - biofortified crop
KW - iron absorption
KW - iron-biofortified potato
KW - stable isotopes
KW - women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154599404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.04.010
DO - 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.04.010
M3 - Article
VL - 153
SP - 1710
EP - 1717
JO - Journal of Nutrition
JF - Journal of Nutrition
SN - 0022-3166
IS - 6
ER -