Toward a core outcome measurement set for polymyalgia rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group

Claire E. Owen; Max Yates; Helen Twohig; Sara Muller; Lorna M. Neill; Eileen Harrison; Beverley Shea; Lee S. Simon; Catherine L. Hill; Sarah L. Mackie

doi:10.3899/jrheum.181050

Toward a core outcome measurement set for polymyalgia rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group

Claire E. Owen
, Max Yates
, Helen Twohig
, Sara Muller
, Lorna M. Neill
, Eileen Harrison
, Beverley Shea
, Lee S. Simon
, Catherine L. Hill
, Sarah L. Mackie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective To report the progress of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Working Group in selecting candidate instruments for a core outcome measurement set.

Methods A systematic literature review identified outcomes measured and instruments used in PMR studies, and a respondent survey and raw data analysis assessed their domain match and feasibility.

Results Candidate instruments were identified for pain [visual analog scale/numerical rating scale (VAS/NRS)], stiffness (VAS/NRS and duration), and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index/modified Health Assessment Questionnaire). Domain match and feasibility assessments were favorable; however, validation in PMR was lacking.

Conclusion Further assessment of candidate instruments is required prior to recommending a PMR core outcome measurement set.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1360-1364
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Rheumatology
Volume	46
Issue number	10
Early online date	1 Apr 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181050
Publication status	Published - Oct 2019

Access to Document

10.3899/jrheum.181050

Accepted_Manuscript
“This is a pre-copyediting, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in The Journal of Rheumatology following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [Toward a Core Outcome Measurement Set for Polymyalgia Rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group Claire E. Owen, Max Yates, Helen Twohig, Sara Muller, Lorna M. Neill, Eileen Harrison, Beverley Shea, Lee S. Simon, Catherine L. Hill and Sarah L. Mackie, 2019] is available online at: 10.3899/jrheum.181050 [http://www.jrheum.org/content/early/2019/03/24/jrheum.181050].”
Accepted author manuscript, 493 KB

http://www.jrheum.org/lookup/doi/10.3899/jrheum.181050

1 Network, Working Group or Professional Association

OMERACT (External organisation)
Yates, M. (Member)
2015 → …
Activity: Membership › Network, Working Group or Professional Association

Cite this

@article{4ade7b8bfcf142348107af470ef83186,

title = "Toward a core outcome measurement set for polymyalgia rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group",

abstract = "Objective To report the progress of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Working Group in selecting candidate instruments for a core outcome measurement set. Methods A systematic literature review identified outcomes measured and instruments used in PMR studies, and a respondent survey and raw data analysis assessed their domain match and feasibility. Results Candidate instruments were identified for pain [visual analog scale/numerical rating scale (VAS/NRS)], stiffness (VAS/NRS and duration), and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire{\textendash}Disability Index/modified Health Assessment Questionnaire). Domain match and feasibility assessments were favorable; however, validation in PMR was lacking. Conclusion Further assessment of candidate instruments is required prior to recommending a PMR core outcome measurement set. ",

author = "Owen, \{Claire E.\} and Max Yates and Helen Twohig and Sara Muller and Neill, \{Lorna M.\} and Eileen Harrison and Beverley Shea and Simon, \{Lee S.\} and Hill, \{Catherine L.\} and Mackie, \{Sarah L.\}",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

doi = "10.3899/jrheum.181050",

language = "English",

volume = "46",

pages = "1360--1364",

journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",

issn = "0315-162X",

publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a core outcome measurement set for polymyalgia rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group

AU - Owen, Claire E.

AU - Yates, Max

AU - Twohig, Helen

AU - Muller, Sara

AU - Neill, Lorna M.

AU - Harrison, Eileen

AU - Shea, Beverley

AU - Simon, Lee S.

AU - Hill, Catherine L.

AU - Mackie, Sarah L.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Objective To report the progress of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Working Group in selecting candidate instruments for a core outcome measurement set. Methods A systematic literature review identified outcomes measured and instruments used in PMR studies, and a respondent survey and raw data analysis assessed their domain match and feasibility. Results Candidate instruments were identified for pain [visual analog scale/numerical rating scale (VAS/NRS)], stiffness (VAS/NRS and duration), and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index/modified Health Assessment Questionnaire). Domain match and feasibility assessments were favorable; however, validation in PMR was lacking. Conclusion Further assessment of candidate instruments is required prior to recommending a PMR core outcome measurement set.

AB - Objective To report the progress of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Working Group in selecting candidate instruments for a core outcome measurement set. Methods A systematic literature review identified outcomes measured and instruments used in PMR studies, and a respondent survey and raw data analysis assessed their domain match and feasibility. Results Candidate instruments were identified for pain [visual analog scale/numerical rating scale (VAS/NRS)], stiffness (VAS/NRS and duration), and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index/modified Health Assessment Questionnaire). Domain match and feasibility assessments were favorable; however, validation in PMR was lacking. Conclusion Further assessment of candidate instruments is required prior to recommending a PMR core outcome measurement set.

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.181050

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.181050

M3 - Article

SN - 0315-162X

VL - 46

SP - 1360

EP - 1364

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

IS - 10

ER -

Toward a core outcome measurement set for polymyalgia rheumatica: Report from the OMERACT 2018 Special Interest Group

Abstract

Access to Document

Activities

OMERACT (External organisation)

Cite this