TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards disaster resilience: A scenario-based approach to co-producing and integrating hazard and risk knowledge
AU - Davies, Tim
AU - Beaven, Sarah
AU - Conradson, David
AU - Densmore, Alex
AU - Gaillard, JC
AU - Johnston, David
AU - Milledge, Dave
AU - Oven, Katie
AU - Petley, Dave
AU - Rigg, Jonathan
AU - Robinson, Tom
AU - Rosser, Nick
AU - Wilson, Tom
PY - 2015/9
Y1 - 2015/9
N2 - Quantitative risk assessment and risk management processes are critically examined in the context of their applicability to the statistically infrequent and sometimes unforeseen events that trigger major disasters. While of value when applied at regional or larger scales by governments and insurance companies, these processes do not provide a rational basis for reducing the impacts of major disasters at the local (community) level because in any given locality disaster events occur too infrequently for their future occurrence in a realistic timeframe to be accurately predicted by statistics. Given that regional and national strategies for disaster reduction cannot be effective without effective local disaster reduction measures, this is a significant problem. Instead, we suggest that communities, local government officials, civil society organisations and scientists could usefully form teams to co-develop local hazard event and effects scenarios, around which the teams can then develop realistic long-term plans for building local resilience. These plans may also be of value in reducing the impacts of other disasters, and are likely to have the additional benefits of improving science development, relevance and uptake, and of enhancing communication between scientists and the public.
AB - Quantitative risk assessment and risk management processes are critically examined in the context of their applicability to the statistically infrequent and sometimes unforeseen events that trigger major disasters. While of value when applied at regional or larger scales by governments and insurance companies, these processes do not provide a rational basis for reducing the impacts of major disasters at the local (community) level because in any given locality disaster events occur too infrequently for their future occurrence in a realistic timeframe to be accurately predicted by statistics. Given that regional and national strategies for disaster reduction cannot be effective without effective local disaster reduction measures, this is a significant problem. Instead, we suggest that communities, local government officials, civil society organisations and scientists could usefully form teams to co-develop local hazard event and effects scenarios, around which the teams can then develop realistic long-term plans for building local resilience. These plans may also be of value in reducing the impacts of other disasters, and are likely to have the additional benefits of improving science development, relevance and uptake, and of enhancing communication between scientists and the public.
KW - Disaster risk quantification
KW - Risk management
KW - Community resilience
KW - Event and effects scenarios
KW - Co-production of knowledge
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.05.009
M3 - Article
VL - 13
SP - 242
EP - 247
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
SN - 2212-4209
ER -