Abstract
This paper conceptualises what sustainability assessment follow-up might entail for three models of sustainability assessment: EIA-driven integrated assessment, objectives-led integrated assessment and the contribution to sustainability model. The first two are characterised by proponent monitoring and evaluation of individual impacts and indicators while the latter takes a holistic view based around focused sustainability criteria relevant to the context. The implications of three sustainability challenges on follow-up are also examined: contested time horizons and value changes, trade-offs, and interdisciplinarity. We conclude that in order to meet these challenges some form of adaptive follow-up is necessary and that the contribution to sustainability approach is the best approach.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 38-45 |
Journal | Environmental Impact Assessment Review |
Volume | 45 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2014 |
Keywords
- Adaptive follow-up
- EIA follow-up
- Integrated assessment
- Trade-offs
- Sustainability assessment
- strategic environmental assessment