TY - JOUR
T1 - Translating best practice principles into criteria for evaluating the consideration of biodiversity in SEA practice
AU - Gallardo, Amarilis Lucia Casteli Figueiredo
AU - Aparecida da Conceição dos Santos, Cintia
AU - Bond, Alan
AU - Moretto, Evandro Mateus
AU - Montaño, Marcelo
AU - Athayde, Simone
N1 - Funding: This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grants 2019/18988-9 (ALCFG); 2021/12252-0 (ALCFG) and 2019/17113-9 (EMM); by the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grants 303542/2020-9 (ALCFG) and 301861/2018-8(MM); and by the National Science Foundation (NSF), grant 1617413 (SA, EMM).
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Biodiversity is a core issue in the quest to achieve sustainable development. Although Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) includes biodiversity as an environmental component to consider in decision-making, its inclusion remains a challenge. Since the beginning of SEA practice, several guides have been proposed to address this challenge, but evaluating their success remains problematic. This paper, therefore, aims to develop an easily applied, criteria-based approach for evaluating the biodiversity assessment that takes place within SEA. A test application of the evaluation framework, based on the International Best Practice Principles on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in SEA, demonstrates its success in identifying whether the main elements of biodiversity were considered in a SEA report. However, the criteria focus on inclusion or exclusion of specific details, rather than the substance of the biodiversity consideration, and so further studies need to develop evaluative approaches for the substantive inclusion of biodiversity in SEA practice.
AB - Biodiversity is a core issue in the quest to achieve sustainable development. Although Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) includes biodiversity as an environmental component to consider in decision-making, its inclusion remains a challenge. Since the beginning of SEA practice, several guides have been proposed to address this challenge, but evaluating their success remains problematic. This paper, therefore, aims to develop an easily applied, criteria-based approach for evaluating the biodiversity assessment that takes place within SEA. A test application of the evaluation framework, based on the International Best Practice Principles on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in SEA, demonstrates its success in identifying whether the main elements of biodiversity were considered in a SEA report. However, the criteria focus on inclusion or exclusion of specific details, rather than the substance of the biodiversity consideration, and so further studies need to develop evaluative approaches for the substantive inclusion of biodiversity in SEA practice.
KW - Strategic Environmental Assessment
KW - Biodiversity
KW - Best Practice Principles
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Brazil
U2 - 10.1080/14615517.2022.2084231
DO - 10.1080/14615517.2022.2084231
M3 - Article
VL - 40
SP - 437
EP - 449
JO - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
JF - Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
SN - 1461-5517
IS - 5
ER -