Abstract
This paper questions the usefulness of the rights-based approach to ameliorating
the social situation of disabled people in Britain and advances two criticisms. First, that
rights and self-de? ned needs have been under-theorised by disability theorists to the extent
that they have insuf? ciently appreciated the problems that these approaches pose. The paper
suggests that rights to appropriate resources to satisfy self-de? ned needs will generate vast
numbers of competing rights claims and that the resulting tendency of rights to con? ict has
been under-appreciated. Secondly, that there has been little consideration of how these
con? icts might be reconciled.
The ? rst two sections of the paper look at the concepts of ascribed and self-de? ned needs,
respectively, whilst the ? nal one looks at some of the problems of the rights approach and
some of the dif? culties of making self-de? ned need the basis of rights claims.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 313-325 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Disability & Society |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver