Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding how consumers categorise nutritional labels: A consumer derived typology for front-of-pack nutrition labelling

  • Charo Hodgkins
  • , Julie Barnett
  • , Grazyna Wasowicz-Kirylo
  • , Malgorzata Stysko-Kunkowska
  • , Yaprak Gulcan
  • , Yesim Kustepeli
  • , Sedef Akgungor
  • , Georgios Chrysochoidis
  • , Laura Fernández-Celemin
  • , Stefan Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann
  • , Michelle Gibbs
  • , Monique Raats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

143 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Significant ongoing debate exists amongst stakeholders as to the best front-of-pack labelling approach and emerging evidence suggests that the plethora of schemes may cause confusion for the consumer. To gain a better understanding of the relevant psychological phenomena and consumer perspectives surrounding FoP labelling schemes and their optimal development a Multiple Sort Procedure study involving free sorting of a range of nutritional labels presented on cards was performed in four countries (n=60). The underlying structure of the qualitative data generated was explored using Multiple Scalogram Analysis. Elicitation of categorisations from consumers has the potential to provide a very important perspective in this arena and results demonstrated that the amount of information contained within a nutrition label has high salience for consumers, as does the health utility of the label although a dichotomy exists in the affective evaluation of the labels containing varying degrees of information aggregation. Classification of exiting front-of-pack labelling systems on a proposed dimension of 'directiveness' leads to a better understanding of why some schemes may be more effective than others in particular situations or for particular consumers. Based on this research an enhanced hypothetical front-of-pack labelling scheme which combines both directive and non-directive elements is proposed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)806-817
Number of pages12
JournalAppetite
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Cite this