Abstract
This comment seeks to acknowledge the reasoning behind the recent Court of Appeal decision in Chandler v Cape Plc. The purpose is to establish why this was not considered a situation where the "corporate veil" was pierced where the court found a duty of care was owed by a parent company to its subsidiary’s employees.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 24(1) |
| Pages (from-to) | 5-7 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | International Company and Commercial Law Review |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Company Law
- Corporate Veil