United Kingdom: Company Law - Corporate Groups

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)


This comment seeks to acknowledge the reasoning behind the recent Court of Appeal decision in Chandler v Cape Plc. The purpose is to establish why this was not considered a situation where the "corporate veil" was pierced where the court found a duty of care was owed by a parent company to its subsidiary’s employees.
Original languageEnglish
Article number24(1)
Pages (from-to)5-7
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Company and Commercial Law Review
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013


  • Company Law
  • Corporate Veil

Cite this