TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of left atrial volume correction for single plane method on four-chamber cine cardiac MRI
AU - Assadi, Hosamadin
AU - Sawh, Nicholas
AU - Bailey, Ciara
AU - Matthews, Gareth
AU - Li, Rui
AU - Grafton-Clarke, Ciaran
AU - Mehmood, Zia
AU - Kasmai, Bahman
AU - Swoboda, Peter P.
AU - Swift, Andrew J.
AU - van der Geest, Rob J.
AU - Garg, Pankaj
N1 - Data Availability Statement: The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available. Access to the raw images of patients is not permitted since specialized post-processing imaging-based solutions can identify the study patients in the future. Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Funding information: P.G. is funded by Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowships (220703/Z/20/Z). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, publishing decisions, or manuscript preparation.
Rights retention statement: For the purpose of Open Access, these authors have applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: Left atrial (LA) assessment is an important marker of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume and function based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to validate single-plane-derived LA indices against the biplane method to simplify the post-processing of cine CMR. Methods: In this study, 100 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals were used as the derivation cohort. Bias correction for the single plane method was applied and subsequently validated in 79 subjects. Results: There were significant differences between the biplane and single plane mean LA maximum and minimum volumes and LA ejection fraction (EF) (all p < 0.01). After correcting for biases in the validation cohort, significant correlations in all LA indices were observed (0.89 to 0.98). The area under the curve (AUC) for the single plane to predict biplane cutoffs of LA maximum volume ≥ 112 mL was 0.97, LA minimum volume ≥ 44 mL was 0.99, LA stroke volume (SV) ≤ 21 mL was 1, and LA EF ≤ 46% was 1, (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: LA volumetric and functional assessment by the single plane method has a systematic bias compared to the biplane method. After bias correction, single plane LA volume and function are comparable to the biplane method.
AB - Background: Left atrial (LA) assessment is an important marker of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) accurately quantifies LA volume and function based on biplane long-axis imaging. We aimed to validate single-plane-derived LA indices against the biplane method to simplify the post-processing of cine CMR. Methods: In this study, 100 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals were used as the derivation cohort. Bias correction for the single plane method was applied and subsequently validated in 79 subjects. Results: There were significant differences between the biplane and single plane mean LA maximum and minimum volumes and LA ejection fraction (EF) (all p < 0.01). After correcting for biases in the validation cohort, significant correlations in all LA indices were observed (0.89 to 0.98). The area under the curve (AUC) for the single plane to predict biplane cutoffs of LA maximum volume ≥ 112 mL was 0.97, LA minimum volume ≥ 44 mL was 0.99, LA stroke volume (SV) ≤ 21 mL was 1, and LA EF ≤ 46% was 1, (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: LA volumetric and functional assessment by the single plane method has a systematic bias compared to the biplane method. After bias correction, single plane LA volume and function are comparable to the biplane method.
KW - CMR
KW - atrial function
KW - heart atria
KW - image processing
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191444823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/tomography10040035
DO - 10.3390/tomography10040035
M3 - Article
VL - 10
SP - 459
EP - 470
JO - Tomography
JF - Tomography
SN - 2379-1381
IS - 4
ER -