TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers
AU - Bingham, S. A.
AU - Cassidy, A.
AU - Cole, T. J.
AU - Welch, A.
AU - Runswick, S. A.
AU - Black, A. E.
AU - Thurnham, D.
AU - Bates, C.
AU - Khaw, K. T.
AU - Key, T. J. A.
AU - Day, N. E.
PY - 1995/4
Y1 - 1995/4
N2 - Results from analysis of 24 h urine collections, verified for completeness with para-amino benzoic acid, and blood samples collected over 1 year were compared with 16 d weighed records of all food consumed collected over the year, and with results from 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated food records in 160 women. Using the weighed records, individuals were sorted into quintiles of the distribution of the urine N excretion:dietary N intake ratio (UN:DN). UN exceeded DN in the top quintile of this ratio; mean ratio UN:DN — 113. Individuals in this top quintile were heavier, had significantly greater body mass indices, were reportedly more restrained eaters, had significantly lower energy intake:basal metabolic rate ratios (EI:BMR), and had correlated ratios of UN:DN and EI:BMR (r —062). Those in the top quintile reported lower intakes of energy and energy-yielding nutrients, Ca, fats, cakes, breakfast cereals, milk and sugars than individuals in the other quintiles but not lower intakes of non-starch polysaccharides, vitamin C, vegetables, potatoes or meat. Correlations between dietary intake from weighed records and 24 h urine K were 0 74 and 082, and between dietary vitamin C and P-carotene and plasma vitamin C and p-carotene 086 and 0-48. Correlations between dietary N intake from weighed records and 24 h urine excretion were high (0-78-0 87). Those between N from estimated food records and urine N were r 0 60-070. Correlations between urine N and 24 h recalls and food-frequency questionnaires were in the order of 0 01 to 0-5. Despite problems of underreporting in overweight individuals in 20% of this sample, weighed records remained the most accurate method of dietary assessment, and only an estimated 7 d diary was able to approach this accuracy.
AB - Results from analysis of 24 h urine collections, verified for completeness with para-amino benzoic acid, and blood samples collected over 1 year were compared with 16 d weighed records of all food consumed collected over the year, and with results from 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated food records in 160 women. Using the weighed records, individuals were sorted into quintiles of the distribution of the urine N excretion:dietary N intake ratio (UN:DN). UN exceeded DN in the top quintile of this ratio; mean ratio UN:DN — 113. Individuals in this top quintile were heavier, had significantly greater body mass indices, were reportedly more restrained eaters, had significantly lower energy intake:basal metabolic rate ratios (EI:BMR), and had correlated ratios of UN:DN and EI:BMR (r —062). Those in the top quintile reported lower intakes of energy and energy-yielding nutrients, Ca, fats, cakes, breakfast cereals, milk and sugars than individuals in the other quintiles but not lower intakes of non-starch polysaccharides, vitamin C, vegetables, potatoes or meat. Correlations between dietary intake from weighed records and 24 h urine K were 0 74 and 082, and between dietary vitamin C and P-carotene and plasma vitamin C and p-carotene 086 and 0-48. Correlations between dietary N intake from weighed records and 24 h urine excretion were high (0-78-0 87). Those between N from estimated food records and urine N were r 0 60-070. Correlations between urine N and 24 h recalls and food-frequency questionnaires were in the order of 0 01 to 0-5. Despite problems of underreporting in overweight individuals in 20% of this sample, weighed records remained the most accurate method of dietary assessment, and only an estimated 7 d diary was able to approach this accuracy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028922503&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1079/BJN19950057
DO - 10.1079/BJN19950057
M3 - Article
C2 - 7794870
AN - SCOPUS:0028922503
SN - 0007-1145
VL - 73
SP - 531
EP - 550
JO - British Journal of Nutrition
JF - British Journal of Nutrition
IS - 4
ER -