Weller & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1176. Weller case highlights need for guidance on photography, privacy and the press

Holly Hancock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Photographs published in the Mail Online of Musician Paul Weller and his young children taken in the street in California were subject to a misuse of private information and breach of Data Protection Act claim against Associated Newspapers Limited. In the Court of Appeal's judgment a number of matters were given consideration, including the application of Californian law, where it was lawful to both take and publish the photographs; whether the claimants had a reasonable expectation of privacy; the relevance of the status of the child and the extent to which matters such as consent play a role. In outlining these issues the case emphasises a need for more clarity on both the taking and publishing of photographs – in relation to the famous and their children, and to children in general.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-31
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Media Law
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jul 2016

Keywords

  • photographs
  • privacy
  • children
  • image rights
  • consent

Cite this