Abstract
In this article, we analyse one of the most famous recent thought experiments in philosophy, namely Donald Davidson’s Swampman. Engaging recent commentators on Davidson’s Swampman as well as analysing the spatio-temporal conditions of the thought-experiment, we will show how the ‘experiment’ inevitably fails. For it doesn’t take seriously some of its own defining characteristics: crucially, Swampman’s creation of a sudden in a place distinct from Davidson’s. Instead of denigrating philosophical thought-experiments per se, our analysis points towards considering thought-experiments in a different sense: imaginary scenarios helpfully self-deconstructing rather than constituting substantive philosophical resources.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 350-366 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Philosophical Investigations |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 12 Apr 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2019 |
Profiles
-
Rupert Read
- School of Politics, Philosophy and Area Studies - Emeritus Associate Professor
- Philosophy - Member
- Wittgenstein - Member
- ClimateUEA - Member
Person: Honorary, Member, Research Group Member, Academic, Teaching & Research